gary.dennis at mantissa.com
Mon Feb 4 03:55:01 EST 2002
I agree that development/build support in the current environments for
deployment in the Pocket PC environment would be ideal.
Any additional supported target platforms should be treated the same as the
existing environments with dubtle differences being "Build Distribution"
----- Original Message -----
From: <Roger.E.Eller at sealedair.com>
To: <use-revolution at lists.runrev.com>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: Pocket PC
> > Yep. Even better if it were like an output module, with the ability to
> > select PocketPC as the build type.
> > --
> > Troy
> > RPSystems
> > www.rpsystems.net
> If this does actually happen, I agree that designing the apps on a desktop
> PC or Mac would be easier than on the PocketPC itself. If you've ever seen
> the PalmOS emulator that developers use, I think that type of environment
> would be ideal. Not necessarily a full-blown PocketPC emulator, but at
> least locking the window resolution and memory requirements to the
> capabilities of the device. You could event overlay an image (skin) so the
> app appears to be running on the actual device. That's my 2 cents worth.
> Does anyone else want to share their "vision" of what would be the ideal
> PocketPC Revolution development environment?
> ~Roger Eller <roger.e.eller at sealedair.com>
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolution at lists.runrev.com
More information about the Use-livecode