Can Xavvi generate sensible text output as well as code?

[J. Landman Gay]

If you watch some of the videos posted on the challenge page it becomes 
clearer. LC AI will be integrated into the script editor and will create 
handlers as expected. You can accept, reject, or revise its output. LC AI 
knows all about what's available and how to use it. Bard, on other hand, 
doesn't know LC and can only offer generic output though it does know 20 
other coding languages.

Xavvi is built on top of LC and the team has reassured us many times that 
the LC we know is not going away. There will be regular updates and you are 
free to ignore the AI if you want. But given what I've seen so far, I'm 
betting most of us will use at least some of its features to save time or 
to expedite certain tasks.

We made the challenge! I'm happy.

--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On May 18, 2023 8:28:42 AM Craig Newman via use-livecode 
<use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> How to integrate the AI part with the LC part? Again, one could acquire 
> just the list, and then let LC generate the output string. But at least all 
> would end up in a handler, fully in LC, where I assume additional “real” 
> work would then be done.
>
> What I mean is, how can one best integrate the “outside” AI work with the 
> “inside” LC work? That is what I have to get my head around.
>
> Lurking in the background,I do not want AI to put LC out to pasture. I did 
> that once with HC, and still have not gotten over it.