Problem using AppleScript of "system events" to click a location on screen
Ben Rubinstein
benr at cogapp.com
Thu Apr 27 14:21:19 EDT 2023
Update to note:
1) Difference in LiveCode versions.
Under the IDE in LiveCode 9.6.7 behaviour is as per the standalone; no click,
and 'the result' is the path to the control. Under the IDE in LiveCode 9.6.8
or LiveCode 10.0.0dp5, 'the result' is "execution error".
2) The browser widget is a red herring; relevant only insofar as if it was
some other spot on the stack, I could just the LiveCode "click at <loc>".
Whether over the browser widget or some other part of the stack window,
invoking the applescript returns the identity of the control at that location,
rather than clicking it (in LC 9.6.7 IDE, or standalone built from any
version); or execution error in later IDEs.
On 27/04/2023 16:42, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode wrote:
> I had a need to click on an element in a web page loaded in a browser widget
> on a card.
>
> There might be an elegant way to do this using javascript injected into the
> widget, but I'm too ignorant to figure it out.
>
> So to save time (hah!), I though I could use the accessibility functionality
> to just click on that bit of the screen. I could get the location to click
> within the stack, then use globalLoc to convert it to screen coordinates.
>
> (This is just a personal stack to achieve an objective, nothing that's ever
> going to be shared with anyone else, so any filthy/fragile method is OK if it
> works.)
>
> I tested this in Script Debugger:
>
> tell application "System Events"
> click at {917, 667}
> end tell
>
> It worked fine.
>
> So then I tried the same script in my stack, via
> do ... as "applescript"
>
> And after a brief spinning pizza, got the dry result "execution error".
>
> I expected that this would happen because I needed to give it permission to
> control the computer; but after granting that in System Preferences, there was
> no change.
>
> Just for fun, I tried building a standalone from my stack. This demonstrated a
> different effect: first I got the same result "execution error". Then I
> granted it permission for this standalone app to 'control the computer'. Now,
> there's still no evidence that it sends a click; but it gives a different
> result, which I think is the path to the UI element corresponding to that
> location. If the point is over a native control in the stack, it's something like
> window "Ben Test Stack (1)" of application process "Ben Test Stack"
> of application "System Events"
>
> (I don't think LiveCode controls are recognisable by the accessibility
> system.) If the point is over the browser widget, 'the result' is something like:
> group 2 of UI element 1 of scroll area 1 of group 1 of group 1
> of window "Ben Test Stack (1)" of application process "Ben Test Stack"
> of application "System Events"
>
> ("Ben Test Stack" is the name of my stack and of the standalone. My guess
> about the complicated control path is that it reflects the complicated web
> page loaded in the browser widget.)
>
> So that does suggest that there is something which doesn't quite work about
> giving the IDE permission to use the Accessibility Framework, but which does
> for a standalone. But still doesn't explain what the problem is.
>
> I finally solved my problem with an even uglier hack: compiling the script
> from Script Debugger as an 'application', and then in my stack, instead of
> executing the applescript directly, using "launch" on that application. Yeuchh.
>
> Can anyone shed light, either on how to grant the IDE permission to use the
> Accessibility controls; or on why the applescript wouldn't work?
>
> TIA,
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
> preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list