Would anyone miss convertOctals?

[Craig Newman]

Mark.

Gong the other way, is your task made much simpler by losing “converOctals”? I assume so, or the issue would never have come up. Are there other similar language elements that also are on the block?

Craig

> On Jun 9, 2022, at 1:03 PM, Ben Rubinstein via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> 1) No (or didn't until I looked just now)
> 2) N/A
> 3) N/A
> 4) N/A
> 
> 
> On 09/06/2022 13:44, Mark Waddingham via use-livecode wrote:
>> So I'm currently sitting here about to embark on fixing <https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=23653> (which is the final thing to sort out before being able to merge my constant expression patch) and I was reminded of 'convertOctals'.
>> Now, generally, I am somewhat averse to actually removing any language feature (even those we have deprecated, unless we absolutely have to!) - however, I would really like to make convertOctals have no effect at all in 10.0+ as it adds a disproportionate amount of complexity compared to (what I think, at least) its utility is (particularly in the context of things 'coming next' like the script compiler).
>> So three questions:
>>   1) Do you know what convertOctals is, and what it does?
>>   2) If you do, have you ever actually used it in any scripts which are actually still in use?
>>   3) If you do use it in any scripts which are still in use, would you be willing to change them to not use it?
>>   4) If you do use/have used it, had you ever noticed that it has been slightly broken for years?
>> Now, its always better to offer a carrot when there is a stick (or in this case, an axe) being wielded and the carrot in this case would be to expand the numeric literal syntax to add both explicit octal and binary number literals alongside hexadecimal:
>>     0xabcdef - hex literal
>>     0o777 - octal literal
>>     0b101110101
>> The key difference between 0o777 and using 0777 (with convertOctals true) is that the former is not ambiguous at parse time, it doesn't require a runtime property set to true in order for the engine to convert the string to a number correctly.
>> Please let me know your thoughts :)
>> Warmest Regards,
>> Mark.
>> P.S. In the scheme of 'breaking changes' - we've already made a number of them for 10 already, and my gut tells me removing convertOctals is likely to cause less consternation than those we already have - but I could be wrong!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode