Widget properties

[Richard Gaskin]

Monte Goulding wrote:

 > ...there has never been any intention of supporting the properties
 > for widgets as far as I’m aware...

If the company wants widgets to be seen as first-class citizens, a 
little more conformity with existing object syntax would go a long way 
to making that happen.

It's possible for the engine to derive a set of widget properties. If 
it's not also possible to map that into how "the properties" works that 
would be very enlightening.


FWIW I've had requests to update my 4W Property Sheet tool to 
special-case for widgets. I tell people I'll take widgets seriously when 
the company does, and if they do I won't need to update my tool because 
the existing call to "the properties" that works for everything else 
will work for widgets.

Maybe I've been overestimating the importance of widgets to LC Ltd. 
Guidance welcome.

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Systems
  Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
  ____________________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com