screen resolution and stack height
David V Glasgow
dvglasgow at gmail.com
Thu Dec 2 13:30:14 EST 2021
Thanks for more thoughts guys. I do have a scale factor button, but don’t want to stretch, so I use ‘letterbox'
The cinematography web page inspired me to experiment more freely and I found that 3:2 seems to be a good compromise despite not matching any screen ’standard'. It scales on screens pretty well, and fits reasonably well printed onto a landscape A4 page, which is about 2.82:2
It is matches the aspect ratio of DSLR sensors and classic 35mm film, which to my eye at least, looks lovely. Perhaps because it is very close to the ‘golden rectangle’ (3:1.85). That could just be me being a bit bonkers, but it would be interesting to know if there is more widely felt appreciation of certain aspect ratios.
So for now I am going with 1200x800
Cheers, & thanks again
David G
> On 2 Dec 2021, at 3:41 pm, Paul McClernan via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Alternatively you could add a magnification control that sets the stack’s
> scaleFactor properly, or sets the stack to fullscreen mode and stretches it
> to fit with fullScreenMode “exact fit”.
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list