Livecode downloads VERY slow

[Alex Tweedly]

OK, memory lane time.

Before we had 1200 baud modems, we used to use acoustic couplers. I 
often used one to call from the main office (England) to our US office, 
at a mind-blowing 300 baud.

Problem was, in those days (1978 I think), even voice transatlantic 
calls were hit or miss. Often you got a undersea cable connection 
(slight delay and echo, but you could have an almost normal 
conversation), other times you got a satellite connection (usually 
little or no echo but very high latency, making conversation frustrating).

The acoustic coupler call would fail if you got the wrong kind of 
connection, so we'd usually wait until the middle for the night to make 
it more likely we'd get a successful call.

Ah fond memories of the days when I could stay up till 3am and still 
function the next day :-)

Alex.

On 23/12/2021 00:41, Martin Koob via use-livecode wrote:
> I must be in the really ancient fogey range.
>
> I remember 1200 baud modems.  In the late ’80s a teacher at our high school in Wawa, Ontario got his hands on one. It was the size of an air fryer. Our computer club at the school hooked it up to a Commodore PET 2001 and tried to connect to Compuserve.  Long waits listening to modem squeals but we never managed to get connected then.  We were in Wawa which is on the north shore of Lake Superior so maybe the phone connection was not good enough.
> Here is the state of the art then, http://www.technofileonline.com/texts/2400modem88.html <http://www.technofileonline.com/texts/2400modem88.html>
>
> I also remember my Apple GeoPort modem with my Mac Quadra 660AV I think.  https://apple.fandom.com/wiki/GeoPort <https://apple.fandom.com/wiki/GeoPort>
>
>  From the above article here are GeoPort speeds.
> GeoPort Telecom Adapter M1694LL/B - 14.4 kilobaud <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/baud> (kbps)
> GeoPort Telecom Adapter (II) M2117LL/A - 28.8 kilobaud <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/baud> (kbps)
> GeoPort Telecom Adapter II M5438LL/A - 33.6 kilobaud <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/baud> (kbps)
>
> Martin
>
>
>> On Dec 22, 2021, at 4:02 PM, Ralph DiMola via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>
>> I just downloaded both the Mac and Win32 simultaneously via the download page in about a minute. Using “SpeedTest”, I get 110Mb/sec.
>>
>> <old fogey> I remember when got our first t1(1.544mb/sec) and thought we were styling ridiculous </old fogey>
>>
>> Ralph DiMola
>> IT Director
>> Evergreen Information Services
>> rdimola at evergreeninfo.net
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: use-livecode [mailto:use-livecode-bounces at lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of William Prothero via use-livecode
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 3:34 PM
>> To: JJS via use-livecode
>> Cc: William Prothero
>> Subject: Livecode downloads VERY slow
>>
>> Folks:
>> When I download an update to Livecode, it takes hours. I’m wondering why. Locally, using “SpeedTest”, I get 160Mb/sec internet speeds. Could it be the livecode server that serves the updates? Just wondering.
>>
>> Best,
>> Bill
>>
>> William Prothero
>> waprothero at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode