Licensing model change
bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com
Tue Aug 31 20:03:09 EDT 2021
I honestly never quite saw how offering a free version alongside commercial versions was going to fly. People need to eat, and if you give something away for free, people will simply not pay for it.
I did the free version for a couple years, mainly because what I create helps almost exclusively myself, and I do not sell anything. I am on Indy for a couple years now because I feel bad about using the software for free, and I feel like I need to contribute to the "cause", which is not purely altruistic by the way. The loss of Livecode would pretty much mean the end of my development hobby.
Overall I welcome this new approach. If you are using LC for free, please consider getting on a subscription, especially if you develop regularly.
> On Aug 31, 2021, at 09:16 , Mike Kerner via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> I just read and watched Kevin's announcement about LC licensing.
> The value for us in the OSS license was simply a greater level of assurance
> that there would be longevity in the event that LC the company failed, as
> the source was still there for someone else to pick up. I think that's how
> MC -> RR.
> So I am disappointed that the code will not be out in the open in the event
> of a business failure, however, I'm also respectful of the need for more
> I will leave it to others to discuss the failure of LC to deliver x,y,z and
> how that plays into the situation.
> I am also not privy to a recent P/L, so I am in a bad position to opine on
> what they should do or prioritize.
> On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
> On the second day, God created the oceans.
> On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
> and did a little diving.
> And God said, "This is good."
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode