encrypting script-only stacks

J. Landman Gay jacque at hyperactivesw.com
Tue Jan 14 12:21:31 EST 2020

Wouldn't a binary script-only stack be the library stack we already have now?
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
On January 14, 2020 9:55:01 AM Richard Gaskin via use-livecode 
<use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> Since script-only stacks contain only a script with no properties, they
> have no password property, and thus cannot be encrypted.
> I had thought that including them in the Stacks pane of the Standalone
> Builder might convert them to binary substacks, where the password could
> apply.  No dice.
> Is it a bug that script-only stacks can't be imported into the stackfile
> to become binary substacks?
> --
>  Richard Gaskin
>  Fourth World Systems
>  Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
>  ____________________________________________________________________
>  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode

More information about the use-livecode mailing list