Another Apple iOS Deadline
dev at porta.ca
Thu Apr 9 14:47:49 EDT 2020
This IS for parity. When Apple announced this at WWDC last year, the pitch was that IF you chose to allow Google or Facebook signin THEN you had to add Apple signin on the top of the other two logos. If you didn’t have any preferential signin then you didn’t need to change anything. As a user, I would NOT use Google or Facebook signin because of tracking issues. I LOVE signing in securely and anonymously via Apple.
To me, this is a good thing that I really approve of.
Sent from the iPad
> On Apr 9, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Brian Milby via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> This is for parity... if you allow Facebook or Google federated authentication then you need to add Apple as an option.
>> On Apr 9, 2020, 2:10 PM -0400, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com>, wrote:
>>> On 4/9/20 11:52 AM, matthias rebbe via use-livecode wrote:
>>> But fortunately the guidelines make exceptions:
>>> Sign in with Apple is not required if:
>>> Your app exclusively uses your company’s own account setup and sign-in systems.
>> Thank God. I almost had a heart attack.
>> Jacqueline Landman Gay | jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>> HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode