repeat with times

[Richmond]

If syntax is invalid it is WRONG, and does not need to be flagged as 
anything, just corrected.

If I write: The dog me bit.

It is wrong: it is not a bug, nor a regression.

Richmond.

On 23.05.19 9:42, ambassador--- via use-livecode wrote:
> andrew at midwestcoastmedia.com wrote:
>
>> I realize there are better and more efficient ways to construct that
>> loop, but the fact that the original code does not throw an error in
>> 9.0.5rc1 but does throw an error in 9.5dp1 made it seem like a
>> regression.
>
> If the syntax is invalid, flagging it as an error isn't a regression, 
> it's a fix.
>
>
>> After re-reading the release notes I think this is probably the result
>> of bug 20951 being squashed @
>> https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=20951
>
> That sounds like it.
>
> - rg/4w
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your 
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode