repeat with times

ambassador at ambassador at
Thu May 23 02:42:20 EDT 2019

andrew at wrote:

> I realize there are better and more efficient ways to construct that
> loop, but the fact that the original code does not throw an error in
> 9.0.5rc1 but does throw an error in 9.5dp1 made it seem like a
> regression.

If the syntax is invalid, flagging it as an error isn't a regression, 
it's a fix.

> After re-reading the release notes I think this is probably the result
> of bug 20951 being squashed @

That sounds like it.

- rg/4w

More information about the use-livecode mailing list