[off]sublimeText update

[Geoff Canyon]

One of the reasons (the only reason?) I don't do something like this with
Navigator is that there are at least a few people that clone the Navigator
repo directly. I'd rather have everyone (Except Brian!) using the same
exact form of Navigator rather than some using the version with script-only
stacks and the rest using binary.

But I agree that Navigator having a crap-ton of script-only behaviors is
cumbersome in the IDE if you're showing IDE stacks.

gc

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 5:32 PM Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> On 3/14/19 9:53 AM, Brian Milby via use-livecode wrote:
>
> > I noticed that the plugin was a single file and wondered how you did
> that.  When I convert Navigator, I create a single sub stack and map each
> behavior to a new button with the same name as the script only stack name.
> I’ll need to read your script a little more closely to see what is
> happening.
>
> Yeah... if only we could treat script-only stacks as substacks, eh?
>
> --
>   Mark Wieder
>   ahsoftware at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode