windows defender issues? & other AV issues

[Bob Sneidar]

Right. The splash stack actually becomes an executable when saved as a standalone. Executables by nature cannot be modified. This is one of the reasons a splash stack approach makes a lot of sense, because now all your attacked stacks/substacks CAN be modified (given they are in a location the OS allows it and the end user has write permissions to that location.) 

Bob S


> On Jan 16, 2019, at 11:50 , R.H. via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> Windows: Regarding the many replies to the question of allowing saving a
> stack file I would like to thank everybody for the answers by Matthias,
> Bob, Alex, Jacqueline, JJS ...
> 
> The problem was that a stack file used by a compiled splash stack does not
> save on some client's computers with Windows systems >= 7 and can only be
> run once leaving an unsaved file that is renamed with a tilde character.