windows defender issues? & other AV issues?
Bob Sneidar
bobsneidar at iotecdigital.com
Mon Jan 7 11:41:08 EST 2019
We disable Windows Defender via group policy. A lot of IT administrators do. It's not that it's a bad product, it's that there are alternatives in the marketplace that provide a great many more features, like central management and distribution of policies, which can universally whitelist folders on all domain controlled workstations.
For the non-domain systems in a small office with a limited budget, Defender is a great solution as an endpoint malware product. However, these are the issues they will encounter, not just with LC apps but with others.
Bob S
> On Jan 6, 2019, at 09:46 , Richard Gaskin via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>
> Tom Glod wrote:
>
> > Hi folks, I'd like to know if there is any chance that the issues with
> > windows defender interfering in the normal operation of the LiveCode
> > engine is something that can and will be looked at?
> >
> > Is there any communication between Microsoft and Livecode inc?
> >
> > Is there any hope that we won't have to put an * beside on our
> > application requirements?
> >
> > Its just not an acceptable workaround to ask customers to disable
> > windows defender.
>
> Panos has found that the issue is specific to Windows Defender's "Real Time Protection":
> https://quality.livecode.com/show_bug.cgi?id=21604
>
> It would be great if LC were the only app affected by this, so the LC team could fix it. But looking 'round the web I find that this is tragically pervasive:
> https://duckduckgo.com/?q=windows+defender+slowing+apps
>
> That said, it does not appear to be completely universal; that is, some apps manage to avoid the wrath of Real Time Protection.
>
> My comment #10 in that bug report asks what LC may be able to do to avoid the impact of this Microsoft bug.
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list