HTML5: mixed signals
richmondmathewson at gmail.com
Fri Jul 28 15:12:09 CEST 2017
Well, that is reasonably obvious . . .
Presumably (?) that means that HTML5 things hived-off the Community
version of LiveCode are in readable Java-script and may be opened
and edited as such,
while the version of HTML5 available for $299/year hives-off protected code?
On 7/28/17 2:39 pm, Heather Laine via use-livecode wrote:
> Um. Like every other platform for LiveCode, there is an open source Community version of HTML5. Not seeing the problem here? You pay for commercial, closed source. You use Community free and share your code.
>> On 28 Jul 2017, at 12:07, Richmond Mathewson via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> I just recieved an e-mail from LiveCode central offering me a licence for HTML5
>> for $299/year.
>> And that seems 'normal' considering my Indy licence does NOT include a licence for HTML5.
>> BUT: the Community version allowed me to build an HTML5 thing.
>> That also seems a bit arsy-versy.
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode