intersect . . . invisible images

[Mike Bonner]

I think part of the problem might be the connection with the quantum here.
Even if the sock is located momentarily, there is no telling how fast or
what direction it is actually going.

There is also the question of quantum "spin" which would seem to indicate
that the washer is a co-culprit in the socks disappearance.

So i guess my question is this.. One sock is still available.  Perhaps
there is a "spooky action at a distance" affect going on, IE quantum
entanglement.  If so, could one add energy to the available sock, and then
read the response in the entangled sock for location purposes?

On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Mark Wieder via use-livecode <
use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:

> On 07/15/2017 09:24 AM, J. Landman Gay via use-livecode wrote:
>
>> It errored with "can't find object" and crashed my dryer. :-(
>>
>
> that's because there's no a 'catch' clause.
>
> try
>   open dryer
>   get socks
> catch missingSock
>   put missingSock into dryer
> finally
>   close dryer
> end try
>
>
>> --
>> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On July 15, 2017 9:25:35 AM Roger Eller via use-livecode <
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>>
>> try
>>>    open sock for write
>>>    write sock until EOS -- (end of sock)
>>>    close sock
>>> end try
>>>
>>
> --
>  Mark Wieder
>  ahsoftware at gmail.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>