Contains vs is in

[hh]

[There is always some crazy time overcrossing here, I posted half an hour before you.]

I have here the following result with your code (in average).

There is a "contains"-repeat and a "is in"-repeat.
If I use one as first and the other as second repeat loop I get that the one that is called first is a little bit faster ...

Isn't it that deep in the stomach of LC both use the same offset(substring, string) routine?

Richard G. wrote:
> Or you could test it:
> 
> on mouseUp
>     put 1000000 into n
> 
>     put the millisecs into t
>     repeat n
>        put ("this is a string with foo in it" contains "foo") into r2
>     end repeat
>     put the millisecs - t into t2
> 
>     put the millisecs into t
>     repeat n
>        put ("foo" is in "this is a string with foo in it") into r1
>     end repeat
>     put the millisecs - t into t1
> 
>     put t1 && t2
> end mouseUp