Script Editor fixable? (was: Configuring a Sublime Text project to notify LiveCode IDE about updates to script only stacks)
Richard Gaskin
ambassador at fourthworld.com
Wed Feb 22 11:16:57 EST 2017
Roger Eller wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2017 9:28 PM, "Richard Gaskin via use-livecode" wrote:
>
>> It's always exciting to see new ground explored with inter-app
>> communications, but with script editors I find myself wondering:
>>
>> Why not use LC's?
>>
>> If it's not on par with alternatives and for some reason can't be
>> made to be on par, why don't we just ship LC with an appropriately-
>> licensed editor, allow hooks like the ones discussed here for any
>> other editor folks might want, and spend the development time we
>> used to spend on LC's editor on other things?
>
> I'm not what you would call a power user, nor do I need an editor that
> handles multiple languages and syntax coloring variations. I like the
> truly integrated LC editor just fine. It is great to see users
> providing options for those who need more than that.
Options are good. I'm wondering if perhaps we could embrace that more
fully.
The SE is a very expensive component to maintain. If we could replace
it with a third-party editor, and put a fraction of the time we used to
spend maintaining and enhancing the SE into providing a mechanism to use
any editor the user prefers, we'd have a better editor in the box and
vast options for using other editors, and save development expense along
the way.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Systems
Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
____________________________________________________________________
Ambassador at FourthWorld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list