Suggestions for LiveCode (the company) to increase its revenue

Graham Samuel livfoss at mac.com
Sun Apr 16 11:53:59 EDT 2017


Me too - I have found the whole process to be irritating and messy. As I have ranted before, deployment issues are really huge for people who see software design and programming as what they do, and having made their software function, just want to deliver it. But to do that, you have to hack your way through the deployment jungle, of which code signing is just a part. So, if LC can make all that easier and make a bit of money doing it, they will certainly get my vote.

Graham

> On 16 Apr 2017, at 17:40, Jonathan Lynch via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
> 
> I would pay for that right now, if LC provided code signing.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Apr 16, 2017, at 11:20 AM, tbodine via use-livecode <use-livecode at lists.runrev.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Code signing can be a major pain point. Adding code-signing features to
>> Livecode (or in a supplemental tool) could be a selling point for Indy and
>> Business license users. I pay about $50 annually for a third-party
>> code-signing tool subscription on the Mac platform. 
>> 
>> LiveCode Ltd may able be able to become a third-party Comodo certificate
>> reseller and make ongoing revenue by providing that service.
>> 
>> Tom B.
>> 
>> 
>> 





More information about the use-livecode mailing list