sluggishness of 8.1.1 on send in 0/wait 0 pairs?

[Dr. Hawkins]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Monte Goulding <monte at appisle.net> wrote:

>
> send “foo” in 0
> —> insert script taking longer than 1 millisecond here
> send “bar” in -1 millisecond
>
> “bar” will be handled after “foo"


This leads to the next question.

ON a "wait 0 with messages", does this effectively put the next line in the
queue as the last (first? random?) entry for the current (next?)
 millisecond?

I had always blithely figured that it would resume once there were no
eligible messages, but that doesn't sound like the case.


-- 
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462