Community PDF Project (was Revenue and the Open Source edition)

[RM]

I don't quite know where you got that idea from.

I would be very much surprised if Kevin Miller had actually stated that; 
it might
be that you concluded that on the basis of something he said; which is 
not the
same thing at all.

I would be extremely interested if you could post a link to that thread.

There are plenty of software packages offered under a variety of licences:
yesterday I downloaded a version of Draftsight which let me have a copy for
personal use for nothing, but charges architects lots of money.

Richmond.

On 4.05.2016 20:14, Robert Mann wrote:
> Just a precision though :
>
> In a former, not so old, enormous thread dealing with the FOSS license and
> trying to understand what it meant in practice, one of the conclusion was
> that *only Livecode can dual license*. Nobody else can do that. And Kevin
> Miller really pushed hard on that point.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Revenue-and-the-Open-Source-edition-tp4704079p4704244.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode