Get fillGradient props

[Richard Gaskin]

J. Landman Gay wrote:

> I think we're pretty evenly split between "c" and "u". I prefer "c" because
> it is, after all, a custom property. Those who migrated from SuperCard
> often prefer "u" because over there, I believe, they are called user
> properties.
>
> Richard's guide is pretty good and I follow the other conventions but I
> can't get used to writing a "u" for something that starts with a "c".
> Apparently the team feels the same.

Back in those early days, when I first started noticing the relatively 
consistent naming conventions in use among some xTalk programmers that I 
later documented in that article, OOP was just coming into vogue and at 
the time several authors were commonly use a "c" prefix to denote class 
definitions in some language (perhaps I first got it from a Dave Mark 
book?  Been so long I don't recall).

Although it's been such a long time between my first proposal for 
parentScripts discussed with the Allegiant team for SuperCard and the 
xTalk world's first implementation in LC a few years ago, I've always 
held onto the belief that the feature's value would eventually be 
self-evident enough to see it happen in some xTalk or another.

Since parentScripts (or as they're now unfortunately/ambiguously called, 
"behaviors") are in effect class definitions, all these years I've been 
holding out hope of using "c" as an identifier for those class 
definition objects.  And indeed, now that we finally have what LC calls 
behaviors, I use "c" that way, in the names of the objects holding a 
behavior script.

It's an admittedly small benefit, made even smaller by my habit of also 
coloring buttons with behavior scripts a bright yellow so they stand out 
even more.  But sometimes that sort of OCD thing makes me happy.

So while LC's nomenclature may make "c" a more natural-seeming fit for 
what it calls "custom properties" for the feature that premiered in the 
xTalk world as "user-defined properties" in SuperCard, for my own code 
(and Ken's and some others as you've noted) I still use "u" for those, 
at long last able to use "c" for the purpose I'd always hoped for. :)

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Systems
  Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
  ____________________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com                http://www.FourthWorld.com