Future crowdsourced features and priorities

[Richmond]

On 9/24/15 7:52 PM, tbodine wrote:
> Yes, multimedia is Livecode's great weakness. Upgrading LC's multimedia to
> modern times was among the stretch goals in the original Kickstarter
> campaign and many of us are awaiting that. Since it was promised and paid
> for as part of that campaign 2.5 years ago, I don't see how they can come
> back to us for funding that particular feature.
>
> Because modern, reliable multimedia support is more important to my business
> than any of the "future features", I'm holding back further investment in
> the LC platform until the multimedia stretch goal is delivered.
>
> I believe LiveCode Ltd. could boost its licensing revenue and reputation by
> creating outstanding multimedia support. As it is now, the lack of modern
> multimedia support is a deal killer for some potential buyers.
>
> I look forward to a day when I can be more enthusiastic about LiveCode and
> support its "future features", but not until "past promises" are delivered.
>
> My two cents.
> Tom Bodine
>
Glad to see it is not only "Richmond the pain" who is saying this . . . 
at last.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Future-crowdsourced-features-and-priorities-tp4696609p4696628.html
> Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>