What is "Open Language"?

[Geoff Canyon]

On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>   and obviously the situation could be made worse by bad extensions, but
>> bad extensions wouldn't survive.
>>
>
> Well, they will if, despite being written in obscurantist code they do
> what they are meant to do.


cruft is cruft, I meant that bad extensions might be used once or twice,
but they wouldn't be used repeatedly.

But it could be the case that something difficult to understand turns out
to be worth the bother, and that no one manages to come up with a clearer
representation for it. In that case, everyone would be free to decide
whether it was worth it to them.