Open Language and stability

[Richmond]

On 25/10/15 17:45, Kevin Miller wrote:
> Absolutely. Open Language is at the very end of the list. The cake has to
> be fully risen before we add icing.

Aah: super, at last; but "by Gum" it takes a lot of 'heavy-lifting' to 
get this sort of definite statement.

Love, Richmond.

P.S. What's the cherry, then?

>
> Kind regards,
>
> Kevin
>
> Kevin Miller ~ kevin at livecode.com ~ http://www.livecode.com/
> LiveCode: Everyone can create apps
>
>
>
>
> On 25/10/2015 13:59, "use-livecode on behalf of Geoff Canyon"
> <use-livecode-bounces at lists.runrev.com on behalf of gcanyon at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> As someone who *really* wants open language, I completely agree with
>> this.
>>
>> gc
>>
>>> On Oct 25, 2015, at 7:06 AM, Graham Samuel <livfoss at mac.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> The discussion about Open Language is interesting, and the idea may
>>> well be a good thing. But I for one would rather hear that for the
>>> actual development team, delivering a rock-solid version of LiveCode on
>>> all supported platforms is taking a massive priority over even thinking
>>> about this stuff. Peter Brett, can you reassure me, as a member of the
>>> use list?
>>>
>>> Graham
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode