[semi-OT] Distributing apps for iOs outside iTunes

[Matthias Rebbe | M-R-D]

> Am 18.03.2015 um 12:16 schrieb Colin Holgate <colinholgate at gmail.com>:
> 
> I would do a mixed approach. Get your client to join at $99 per year, and to have you as a team member. They would include at least one of your devices in their list, so you can test installs, and you would be able to build for up to 100 devices. If they only need about 10, that would cover quite a few employee and device changes.
> 
And if i remember right every year you can reset that list of devices. This would allow you to delete non active devices and it increases the number of possible test devices again.




> 
>> On Mar 18, 2015, at 6:23 AM, Mark Wilcox <mark at sorcery-ltd.co.uk> wrote:
>> 
>> I've used Ad Hoc Distribution for this a few times before - it can become a  
>> bit of a pain because employees join and people get new devices - you have  
>> to manage updates to the provisioning profile manually - more often than  
>> you'd think. 
>> 
>> 
>> A better option is if you can get the client to join the iOS Developer  
>> Enterprise Program: 
>> 
>> https://developer.apple.com/programs/ios/enterprise/ 
>> 
>> 
>> It's $299/year but then you can get Enterprise distribution profiles/ 
>> certificates. These don't have any device restrictions at all, it's just  
>> part of Apple's rules that they're only allowed for internal use within an  
>> Enterprise. This removes all the issues with collecting UDIDs and keeping  
>> provisioning profiles updated. 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>> Mark Wilcox 
>> 
>> mark at sorcery-ltd.co.uk 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, at 06:36 AM, jbv at souslelogo.com wrote: 
>> 
>>> Hi list
>>> One of my clients needs an app for his employees that will run
>>> on their iphones or itabs. Those employees are very few (less than
>>> 10) and no one else will be interested in the app because it's
>>> related to a very specific activity, therefore using iTunes doesn't
>>> seem relevant.
>>> I took a look at Apple's distribution options, and the "Ad Hoc
>>> Distribution" looks like the way to go, but I was wondering if
>>> anyone had already use it, or if there was any better option...
>>> 
>>> Thanks in advance
>>> jbv
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode