OT: No More Servers
david at viral.academy
Sat Jul 18 08:36:44 CEST 2015
Yes good feature request.
My approach with Livecode and p2p is not to implement everything in
Livecode. If we did that we would be back to the same problems we have with
Livecode and the web stack - I want to integrate the new p2p tools into the
Livecode tool chain using a combination of command line, C/C++/etc
Livcecode Builder extensions, and/or REST calls to a p2p server running on
By the way I think I'm not paying enough attention to the Forum's - there
is an API / Livecode stack for interfacing with information there? Also do
we have a chat / irc channel or equivalent? Not the lovely chatrev -
something that developers in other languages can easily hop into and out of?
On 18 July 2015 at 01:51, Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com> wrote:
> David Bovill wrote:
> > Is anyone on this list interested in topics of decentralised
> > architecture? I've a long standing interest in them, and there
> > are some very interesting new tools that I feel are of deep
> > relevance to Livecode and the Livecode community.
> > A decentralised architecture is one without servers - communication
> > is P2P. Federated architectures are also interesting, and a mix of
> > both is even better.
> There was a good conversation about P2P in the forums a while back:
> One of the challenges identified in that discussion was the need for UDP
> hole punching - here's the request cited in the fourth comment:
> Seems like it would be a relatively small change to make in the engine, no?
> Richard Gaskin
> Fourth World Systems
> Software Design and Development for the Desktop, Mobile, and the Web
> Ambassador at FourthWorld.com http://www.FourthWorld.com
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode