including a library in a standalone
dochawk at gmail.com
Tue Jul 7 01:14:14 CEST 2015
I happily managed to get the library stack working for shared routines in
pretty much a matter of minutes.
I've got my routine to prepare for compile copying the library stack to the
However, I assumed "library stack libStackName" would work in a standalone,
but it creates errors error 91 and 568 (can't find stack).
I very much do not want to have a stack hanging around to potentially have
its routine's called, password protected or not; I want a monolithic app.
Is inserting as a back script there way to go? And if so, would I be
better off doing the same in the IDE rather than as a library?
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
More information about the use-livecode