Project Browser vs App Browser (was "script scope variables inexplicably becoming unset")

[Peter Haworth]

Thanks for the input Bill.

I think it would be hard for me to sell lcStackBrowser on the basis of
video/screenshots, although I do have some old videos of the product in
use.  It has so many features and functionality that the video would be too
long or I'd have to come up with fairly large number of short videos.

I think perhaps the free, feature reduced version might be the way to go
but deciding which ones to leave out would be the challenge there.

I'll figure something out.

Pete
lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>
Home of lcStackBrowser <http://www.lcsql.com/lcstackbrowser.html> and
SQLiteAdmin <http://www.lcsql.com/sqliteadmin.html>

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:40 PM, Bill Vlahos <bvlahos at mac.com> wrote:

> I faced this same dilemma with lcTaskList.
>
> I had many great people on this list encourage me to not sweat my coding
> insecurities. It is what it is and if it works no one cares.
> You are correct in that there is no way to protect your code if it is
> unlocked.
> You either release a feature reduced version as the trial where the
> “missing” code is removed (not just commented - removed)
> You make it shareware/honor system
> You eliminate the trial version entirely and sell the unprotected version.
> People buy it or not based on screen shots, demonstrations videos, and/or
> reputation
> With lcTaskList I chose #3: eliminate the trial version completely and
> only sell a version that is unprotected so it works on all versions of
> LiveCode.
>
> Bill Vlahos
> _________________
> InfoWallet (http://www.infowallet.com) is about keeping your important
> life information with you, accessible, and secure.
> lcTaskList: (http://www.infowallet.com/lctasklist/index.htm)
> RunRev lcTaskList Forum: (http://forums.runrev.com/viewforum.php?f=61)
>
> > On Jan 3, 2015, at 6:04 PM, Peter Haworth <pete at lcsql.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Mark Wieder <mwieder at ahsoftware.net>
> wrote:
> >
> >> That would be awesome. It's much better than the AB or the PB.
> >> It's kind of like the best parts of both, and then still better than
> >> that.
> >>
> >
> > To be honest, the only things holding me back are finding a good simple
> > dual license and embarrassment at revealing my less than stellar coding
> > over the years :-)
> >
> > Nothing I can do about the latter but any help in finding a dual license
> > template would be most welcome.  Plus, how can I ensure people agree to
> the
> > license terms since they can easily disable whatever code I put in there
> to
> > display it?  Or maybe that's too paranoid?
> >
> > Pete
> > lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>
> > Home of lcStackBrowser <http://www.lcsql.com/lcstackbrowser.html> and
> > SQLiteAdmin <http://www.lcsql.com/sqliteadmin.html>
> > _______________________________________________
> > use-livecode mailing list
> > use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> > Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> > http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>