matchText question

Mike Bonner bonnmike at gmail.com
Wed Feb 25 17:53:19 EST 2015


Yes, it was to me too. Though, I did end up breaking it down into singles
and they all behaved the same, which made it easier to take a WAG.  Less
wild than it would have otherwise been. Find the thing that's the same for
each part, and decide if its broke.

On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:50 PM, stephen barncard <
stephenREVOLUTION2 at barncard.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Mike Bonner <bonnmike at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Try this instead..
> >     put "(?i)^\s*(\-\-\s+begin)\s+(\w+).*+|" & \
> >          "^\s*(on)\s+(\w+).*+|" & \
> >          "^\s*(function)\s+(\w+).*+|" & \
> >          "^\s*(command)\s+(\w+).*+|" & \
> >          "^\s*(private\s+function)\s+(\w+).*+|" & \
> >          "^\s*(private\s+command)\s+(\w+).*+|" & \
> >          "^\s*(\/\*\s+include).*+|" &  \
> >           "^\s*(\*\/).*+" \
> >          into expr
> >
>
> breaking down and displaying complex REGEX this way is very helpful.
>
> *--*
> *Stephen Barncard - San Francisco Ca. USA - Deeds Not Words*
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>



More information about the use-livecode mailing list