Reverse a list
bernd.niggemann at uni-wh.de
Tue Feb 17 00:26:19 CET 2015
Peter Haworth wrote
> That's very interesting. I've never used private since I had the
> impression that the only thing it did was stop the handler from being
> called outside of the script it appears in.
> But it seems there is a performance benefit too. Why would that be, I
> wonder. I understand that the engine only needs to look in the current
> script for a private handler, but isn't that where the search for a
> starts anyway?
from the dictionary:
> Using private handlers when appropriate will also result in a performance
> gain as less messages are passed through the message path.
View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/Reverse-a-list-tp4688611p4688930.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the use-livecode