hair-pulling frustration

[Mark Schonewille]

I'll give you 2 cents for that, Éric. I also don't think that RunRev 
will listen. Yet, I think a company should not rely on its user base for 
testing. A company can't blame its user base for not testing, if 
something appears not to work, but a user base can blame the company for 
delivering broken software. Therefore, it would be wise to listen.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Installer Maker for LiveCode:
http://qery.us/468

Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner" 
http://qery.us/3fi

LiveCode on Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/runrev/

On 11/13/2014 10:00, Éric Miclo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do agree that more testing (non automatic testing) should be made before releasing a commercial product.
> But I’m not sure RunRev will listen.
>
> When the CEO says:
>   "I really would urge everyone in our community to move to 7 as soon as possible. We spent 18 months building it and considering the amount of change its getting very good results stability wise. There are issues but they are mostly minor."
>
> When minor bugs are so many, I don’t consider it is minor to test and fix before releasing a commercial product.
> And by fixing I mean test if the fix really fixes the bug so it doesn’t have to be reopened immediately.
> It is not the amount of time spent on a product that is an indicator of quality.
>
> My 2 cents.
>
> Best,
>
> ÉrIC

>