Reading and decoding binary data
prothero at earthednet.org
prothero at earthednet.org
Thu Mar 13 14:51:42 EDT 2014
Thanks, Richard. That lets me anticipate the new changes. I'm also modifying images and I'l convert that code to use byteToNum.
Bill
William Prothero
http://es.earthednet.org
On Mar 13, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Richard Gaskin <ambassador at fourthworld.com> wrote:
> prothero wrote:
>
> > Mainly, what I was wondering is if the byteToNum command is the
> > correct one. In images, its the convert character to number, but
> > I thought the character commands for binary data were going to
> > be deprecated.
>
> Yes, for comparing a single-byte value, byteToNum is the better choice.
>
> Very soon charToNum may involve multi-byte sequences for Unicode, so all code that uses it where a single-byte value is needed should be updated to use byteToNum instead.
>
> --
> Richard Gaskin
> Fourth World
> LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
> Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
> Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list