"...for neither" - really?

[Richard Gaskin]

Mark Wieder wrote:
> Richard-
>
> Friday, July 25, 2014, 7:18:12 PM, you wrote:
>
>> i thought some sort of default came into play without further modifiers, no?
>
>> What happens now when you call it with no modifiers?
>
> I thought Monte was suggesting this as an enhancement?

He was, but as I wrote I thought the reason we had to write the 
silly-sounding "for neither" was because with no args it uses some sort 
of defaults.

Well, I just tested it and it seems that the defaults it uses are 
exactly what's been proposed here.

Should I submit a Dictionary bug to have this simpler less silly form 
documented?

And FWIW I only tested with a shell call to aplay - anyone else want to 
confirm this before I file the report?

-- 
  Richard Gaskin
  Fourth World Systems
  Software Design and Development for Desktop, Mobile, and Web
  ____________________________________________________________
  Ambassador at FourthWorld.com        http://www.FourthWorld.com