Defining Pet Features and Essentials

Richmond richmondmathewson at gmail.com
Wed Feb 12 06:38:41 EST 2014


On 12/02/14 12:47, Ender Nafi Elekcioglu wrote:
> Part 1:
>
> I knew that this thread will turn into a technical help topic :/
>
> Folks,
> please don’t get me wrong, my intention is far from being rude.
> I’m not trying to solve a particular issue, here.
> Check the subject line, please.
>
> I know I’m the *new guy*
> and I’ve noticed that whenever someone relatively new to Livecode opens a somewhat criticizing topic
> either on forums or in this user-list,
> that thread is either ignored or gets away from its main focus quickly.
>
> Let’s assume that I’m a lousy coder with an IQ of just 68
> and the reason why that page in the video is not responding is totally my fault and lack of knowledge.
>
> Does this change the topic?
>
> I opened this thread to discuss what features are really, truly, objectively *essential*.

What does "objectively" mean? I have yet to see anything "objective" 
except stones on the beach.

>
> Does Livecode not need a revamped url library, modern limits for object sizes, an engine with enough horsepower for the year 2014 not for 2002?
>
> Does Livecode not need multithreading, benefiting more from GPU?
>
> Does Livecode not need those features *more* than pluggable themes and resolution independence?

It depends who you ask.

There is no single answer. After all; my Livecode and your Livecode are 
already 2 different Livecodes: what about all the others ?
>
> Which ones are more important for a modern development environment?
>
>
>
> ~ to be continued...
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode





More information about the use-livecode mailing list