extremely weird and frustrating...

Alex Tweedly alex at tweedly.net
Wed Apr 2 09:59:46 CEST 2014


25:34 and 34:55 are not valid dateTimes, so where those lines get sorted 
to is not well undefined; it looks as though LC simply decides to give 
them a '0:00'.

Apart from those two lines, it looks (to me) like the result is correct. 
Isn't it ?

-- Alex.


On 02/04/2014 08:41, larry at significantplanet.org wrote:
> Here is my script line:
> sort field myTimes descending dateTime
>
>
> And here is the result:
> 16:33
>
> 15:56
>
> 12:16
>
> 11:35
>
> 9:14
>
> 7:47
>
> 2:08
>
> 1:22
>
> 25:34
>
> 34:55
>
>
>
> Here is my other script line:
>
> sort field myTimes ascending dateTime
>
> And here is the result for that:
>
> 25:34
>
> 34:55
>
> 1:22
>
> 2:08
>
> 7:47
>
> 9:14
>
> 11:35
>
> 12:16
>
> 15:56
>
> 16:33
>
>
>
> Seriously?
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode




More information about the use-livecode mailing list