OT: Time Machine Alternatives?
MikeKerner at roadrunner.com
Wed Oct 16 16:28:17 EDT 2013
I haven't had any issues with Time Machine on multiple boxes, using
different drives at different locations.
That said, before TM I have used Retrospect for 20 years, sometimes
standalone, but mostly on the network for our entire company, and to my
memory, I have never had a recovery failure from Retrospect, despite a pile
of 32 dead hard drives (at last count) sitting on a desk behind me. We
have backed up to DAT, Travan, disk drives, and probably other technologies
during that time.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Mark Wieder <mwieder at ahsoftware.net> wrote:
> I've been using Time Machine to make backups, and it seems to do that job
> well, but the backup disk ends up with cross-linked files pretty rapidly
> I end up reformatting the backup disk and starting from scratch frequently.
> This seems to me to be missing the point of having historical backups.
> So I'm throwing this open to see what others are using for backups on OSX.
> assume there's something better than Time Machine out there and I'm just
> aware of it. Thanks in advance.
> (Note: I should probably disallow Jacque from responding in the future...)
> Mark Wieder
> mwieder at ahsoftware.net
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
> subscription preferences:
On the first day, God created the heavens and the Earth
On the second day, God created the oceans.
On the third day, God put the animals on hold for a few hours,
and did a little diving.
And God said, "This is good."
More information about the Use-livecode