Why Microsoft Word must Die

[Richmond]

On 15/10/13 00:21, Mike Kerner wrote:
> Which reminds me, the LC script editor must be brought into this century.

I don't really find anything wrong with the LC script editor.

In fact I am glad it is not bogged down with 'features' that would serve
as distractions.

>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> On 10/14/2013 10:00 PM, Mark Wieder wrote:
>>
>>>   From Charlie Stross:
>>>
>>> <http://www.antipope.org/**charlie/blog-static/2013/10/**
>>> why-microsoft-word-must-die.**html<http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2013/10/why-microsoft-word-must-die.html>
>>> <cough>
>>> http://www.libreoffice.org/
>>>
>>>
>> Presumably this is why Apple/Claris stopped Clarisworks, Appleworks; my
>> favourite office suite.
>>
>> The reasons Charlie Stross uses in his argument about "Word" can be
>> applied to Microsoft in general.
>>
>> The worst thing is that the developers of Oppen Office anf Libre Office
>> feel they have to
>> produce imitations of "Word", when they could develop far better
>> interfaces.
>>
>> Richmond.
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/**mailman/listinfo/use-livecode<http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode>
>>
>
>