Strict compilation mode
john at onechip.com
Sat Oct 5 13:34:11 EDT 2013
I also find strict compilation mode critical. Without out it I would spend a lot of time fixing simple typos. I am also using 6.1.2 to develop an application that is reasonably large (the main stack has sub stacks, there are a fair number of cards, and probably something on the order of 5K lines of code).
I am not having any particular issue with it. My main gripe with 6.X is how slow things can occasionally get when the project browser is showing something that I am programmatically altering (I have a group in which a hundred or so objects are being destroyed, created, moved around, etc.).
On Oct 5, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Peter Haworth <pete at lcsql.com> wrote:
> I haven't used v6 much so far but you're scaring me! What's the problem?
> I'm of course aware of the shadowing variable name issue; it happens
> infrequently enough for me that I'm willing to put up with it. Is it worse
> in v6?
> lcSQL Software <http://www.lcsql.com>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Dr. Hawkins <dochawk at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Peter Haworth <pete at lcsql.com> wrote:
>>> I'm a big fan of strict compilation mode.
>> I find it critical.
>> I can't call myself a fan, as it doesn't work properly . . . And it's so
>> borked on 6 that I've had to stay with 5.5 . . .
>> Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
>> (702) 508-8462
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode