master/slave stack links
Dr. Hawkins
dochawk at gmail.com
Sat Nov 30 22:17:24 EST 2013
I've fixed it.
Kind of odd: I scp'd 4 files in one transaction, and two ended up like
this . . .
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Dr. Hawkins <dochawk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here are the links, with the original message following
>
> http://dochawkbk.com/lcImages/master.livecode
> http://dochawkbk.com/lcImages/slave.livecode
>
>
>
> I've attached a pair of trivial demo stacks here.
>
> They assume that the standalones get compiled to the desktops in folders,
> and probably need to be changed . . . I even added that they
> are public domain at the top of the stack scripts . . .
>
> Anyway, what they try to do is have "master" open "slave", This much
> works.
> It opens for "binary update". "The result" is unchanged, so there is
> apparently no error (but shouldn't it be set to empty on success?
>
> The slave loops every second, watching standard input, and displaying that
> in it's field.
>
> But nothing happens . . .
>
> I'm including these as I figure it would be useful to have a file pair
> that actually works available on, uhm, wherever the sample files are these
> days.
>
> I actually want to turn this back into a single executable, whose behavior
> depends upon which name it was called under (so the visible slave file
> would be a link to the master.
>
> *really* nice would be for two livecode processes to be able to share a
> SQLite :memory: database . . .
>
> --
> Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
> (702) 508-8462
>
--
Dr. Richard E. Hawkins, Esq.
(702) 508-8462
More information about the use-livecode
mailing list