Printing quality in 6.5

[Marty Knapp]

I just printed to PDF and enlarged it, looked good, printed the PDF not 
so good. This was done on Mavericks. So I then transferred the PDF to a 
Snow Leopard machine and it prints fine, so it appears to be a Mavericks 
issue. The weird thing is that printing from LC 6.1.3 on Mavericks looks 
good.

Marty
> Hi Marty,
>
> Just done a test and found no problems printing text or high res images on Mac OS X 10.8.5 to Epson R2000, I can't see any difference at all.
>
> I also printed to PDF and compared enlarged PDFs, still no difference, in fact at max enlargement in Preview the text is still crisp indicating that LC printed the text as vector data not pixel data.
>
> Paul
>
>
> On 2013-11-27, at 1:11 PM, Richmond <richmondmathewson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 27.11.2013 22:33, Marty Knapp wrote:
>>> I just did a quick test print on my Mac of a stack with a couple of fields with text in them. In LC 6.1.3 the text is nice and crisp but on 6.5 it's a bit pixelated - definitely lower quality. It looks like it's printing it as a graphic. Haven't tried it on Windows but this is not good news for me. Is anybody else seeing this?
>>>
>>> Marty Knapp
>>>
>> I don't quite understand how that can have happened.
>>
>> I thought that 6.1.3 was merged with 6.5.0; maybe not.
>>
>> Richmond.
>>