RELEASE: LiveCode 6.5 RC6
ebeugelaar at gmail.com
Wed Nov 20 21:45:58 CET 2013
I agree. In the old days you were happy when the RC3 was released because
in those days you knew that the release version was the next one.
Releasing RC¹s in a short time is not good because it looks like the house
is in fire And is not.
Software development is most of the time solving errors, caused by us,
On 20/11/13 21:32, "Richard Gaskin" <ambassador at fourthworld.com> wrote:
>Alejandro Tejada wrote:
> > Bug hunting is a daily routine in software developer's life.
>True, but developers all need to split their time between testing their
>own stuff and testing the other systems their stuff relies on.
>For example, I'm not sure how much time RunRev devotes to submitting bug
>reports for each new version of OS X or Ubuntu, and my own testing
>efforts focus similarly on my clients' work first, and LC engine second.
> > What do you think?
> > Should we invent unique names for these bugs, besides a number?
>The current setup is generally fine, but if it were up to me (and many
>are glad it isn't) I'd make only two small adjustments:
>1. Email notices of releases would only include the fixes and
>enhancements specific to the release.
>2. I would label a build "Release Candidate" only when it's a candidate
>for release. Anything with outstanding known issues would continue to
>be labeled "Developer Preview" until those are resolved.
> Richard Gaskin
> Fourth World
> LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
> Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
> Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/FourthWorldSys
>use-livecode mailing list
>use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
More information about the use-livecode