RELEASE: LiveCode 6.5 RC6
capellan2000 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 20 15:10:22 EST 2013
Richard Gaskin wrote
> I have no problem with frequent releases. Nightly builds are a common
> and growing practice with agile companies, and in many ways it's very
> encouraging to see RunRev deploy quickly.
> But with RCs we see quite a variance, sometimes weeks and sometimes
> hours, and it would be helpful to know if perhaps there were serious
> data-loss issues or other factors which determine when there are shorter
> intervals between releases.
If I understand correctly, developers should test (not develop) their
using always the latest Release Candidates.
When a feature goes wrong, then the developer must test the same feature
in previous Release Candidates, until the developer reach a version where
such feature works correctly.
Bug hunting is a daily routine in software developer's life.
What do you think?
Should we invent unique names for these bugs,
besides a number?
Where is the Name Generator stack? :D
View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/RELEASE-LiveCode-6-5-RC6-tp4672605p4672627.html
Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Use-livecode