Misunderstanding developer previews versus release candidates

[Richmond]

On 3.11.2013 20:41, Roger Eller wrote:
> Oh Richmond!  I meant to say "software titles".  ;-p

No worries: red wine!

> On Nov 3, 2013 1:36 PM, "Richmond" <richmondmathewson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3.11.2013 20:23, Roger Eller wrote:
>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2013 1:01 PM, "J. Landman Gay" wrote:
>>>
>>>> If they've proved stable in-house, they are apt to go directly to release
>>>>
>>> candidate for final testing.
>>> Speaking of apt, I wonder if the Linux version of LC Community will ever
>>> become accessible via apt-get, as are most Linux software.
>>>
>>>
>> Surely that should read:
>>
>> "as IS most Linux software"
>>
>> 'software' being (last time I looked) both an uncountable and a mass noun.
>>
>> Richmond.
>>
>>   --
>>>> Jacqueline Landman Gay         |     jacque at hyperactivesw.com
>>>> HyperActive Software           |     http://www.hyperactivesw.com
>>>>
>>> ~Roger
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> use-livecode mailing list
>>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>>> subscription preferences:
>>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
>>
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode