[OT] "MacMini" 7-8 years later
roger.e.eller at sealedair.com
Sun Mar 3 13:39:19 EST 2013
I had a super-crazy idea once. It remains untested, but imagine a user who
uses 90% Windows software, and 10% Mac software. If that user has a REAL
made by Apple Mac, why not install Windows as the primary OS, and confine
OS X to the relm of virtualization? Why? Because Apple says no, as it would
reduce the performance of their OS, and ruin that 'oh so special'
On Mar 3, 2013 1:27 PM, "Roger Eller" <roger.e.eller at sealedair.com> wrote:
> What is the performance like in a VM on old hardware? Wouldn't it be
> faster if installed directly in a partition?
> On Mar 3, 2013 1:22 PM, "Richmond" <richmondmathewson at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 03/03/2013 07:44 PM, Roger Eller wrote:
>>> I only suggest that they allow an unsupported fork because 'support' for
>>> all that crazy PC hardware is the typical answer for why Apple doesn't do
>> I don't believe Apple.
>> I think the reason they will not allow people to install Mac OS X on
>> non-Apple computers
>> is because Apple computers are very expensive, and once they allow people
>> to install their OS on
>> other hardware they fear people will stop buying their machines.
>> That is exactly why I bought Mac OS 10.6 and run it inside VMware Player
>> in a second hand DELL Optiplex 745
>> with 6 Gigs of RAM, which cost me, in total, 300 Euros . . .
>> ( 100 for the computer, 100 for another 4 Gigs of RAM, 100 for the
>> wide-screen monitor )
>> . . . and exactly why Apple don't like people like me, because a
>> bottom-of-the range 21.5 inch iMac costs
>> about 1,269 Euros.
>> I don't expect an support from Apple; which is just as well, as they
>> won't give me anything except a boot
>> up the nether regions!
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
>> subscription preferences:
More information about the Use-livecode