Control From Outside

Mark Schonewille m.schonewille at economy-x-talk.com
Thu Aug 22 04:11:57 EDT 2013


Hi Mike,

In that case, sockets are indeed not the right approach. It should be 
possible to use a standalone as a command line utility, with parameters 
as I explained before.

Hiding the LiveCode interface would seem more elegant to me. Maybe you 
can still use -u to hide the user interface altogether. You could also 
set the visible of your stacks to false.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other 
colour spaces. http://www.color-converter.com

Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner" 
http://qery.us/3fi

Fill out this survey please
http://livecodebeginner.economy-x-talk.com/survey/

On 8/22/2013 03:57, Mike Kerner wrote:
> And Mark S., sorry, I wasn't ignoring you, I just didn't see your message.
> I have a system that's written in 4D that needs some functionality added to
> it.  The code to do that is already written in LC.  Converting it would
> work, but why bother, when I can just create a standalone in LC that I call
> from 4D?
>
>





More information about the use-livecode mailing list