m.schonewille at economy-x-talk.com
Wed Aug 7 23:54:45 CEST 2013
First of all, if it is properly documented, people will understand that
"this control" is a bit of an exception.
Second, if you ask for ideas, you should not immediately reject
everything I write, because you're scaring potential contributors to the
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Use Color Converter to convert CMYK, RGB, RAL, XYZ, H.Lab and other
colour spaces. http://www.color-converter.com
Buy my new book "Programming LiveCode for the Real Beginner"
Fill out this survey please
On 8/7/2013 23:40, Monte Goulding wrote:
> On 08/08/2013, at 7:08 AM, Mark Schonewille <m.schonewille at economy-x-talk.com> wrote:
>> Why do you want "this me" to have sense outside a behavior script, if the only place where it will be used is in a behavior script?
> I'm not really sure but that's the main reason I can think of for 'this behavior' being rejected ;-)
>> Apparently, "this group", "this control" etc. is not a synonym of "me" because currently "this group", "this control" etc. throws an execution error while "me" doesn't. That makes "this group", "this control" etc. a very feasible candidate.
> Sorry, I didn't mean it's currently a synonym of me. I meant that if implemented I think people would naturally expect it to be a synonym of me. Or perhaps this group in the context of a control script would actually be the containing group reference...
> Monte Goulding
> M E R Goulding - software development services
> mergExt - There's an external for that!
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
More information about the use-livecode