Strict Compile Mode

[Peter M. Brigham]

Sometimes my sense of humor just takes a vacation….

-- Peter

Peter M. Brigham
pmbrig at gmail.com
http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig

On Oct 9, 2012, at 11:37 AM, Bob Sneidar wrote:

> I think he was joking. 
> 
> On Oct 9, 2012, at 4:53 AM, Peter M. Brigham wrote:
> 
>> That's fine if you never use visual effects, since everything unlocks when the current handlers are done and the engine issues an idle message. But if you need visual transitions, scattering around lock screen commands is a nightmare -- I can't tell you how much time I've spend trying to chase down an obscure extra lock screen that breaks my visual effects.
>> 
>> -- Peter
>> 
>> Peter M. Brigham
>> pmbrig at gmail.com
>> http://home.comcast.net/~pmbrig
>> 
>> On Oct 8, 2012, at 6:30 PM, Peter Haworth wrote:
>> 
>>> I've pretty much decided that every handler should start with lock messages
>>> and lock screen...
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> use-livecode mailing list
>> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
>> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
>> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> use-livecode mailing list
> use-livecode at lists.runrev.com
> Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences:
> http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-livecode