[OT] LC's Fields of the Future

[Mark Schonewille]

Hi Richard,

Yes, LiveCode has features that RealStudio doesn't have, but I was talking about full unicode compliance only.

I do have a license for RealStudio and like it a lot, but I still use LiveCode for many projects.

--
Best regards,

Mark Schonewille

Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Homepage: http://economy-x-talk.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/xtalkprogrammer
KvK: 50277553

Download the Installer Maker Plugin 1.7 for LiveCode here http://qery.us/za

On 24 feb 2012, at 16:06, Richard Gaskin wrote:
> 
> They may not make sense to you, but they make sense to others.
> 
> Yes, RealBASIC has features that LiveCode doesn't and vice versa.   So it goes - if all RAD tools were the same there would be no need for more than one of them.
> 
> I share your interest in seeing Unicode enhanced, esp. with regard to the semetic and other languages that use RTL.   I understand RunRev shares this interest too and is actively working on it, but given how deeply RTL affects so many aspects of interaction and underlying data structures it's not surprising that those relatively few languages will take some additional time to support.
> 
> In the meantime, while your needs may differ there are a good many of us who find tremendous value for a great many projects with the new field enhancements.
> 
> If you prefer RealBASIC you can obtain a license here:
> <http://www.realsoftware.com/>
> 
> --
> Richard Gaskin
> Fourth World
> LiveCode training and consulting: http://www.fourthworld.com
> Webzine for LiveCode developers: http://www.LiveCodeJournal.com
> LiveCode Journal blog: http://LiveCodejournal.com/blog.irv